Rent, affordable homes, zoning, and decisions that shape where people can live.
The commission is asked to adopt an ordinance that requires sellers to disclose information about heritage trees on a property when transferring it.
Council will consider a resolution to let the city manager sign the second amendment to the Urban County Cooperation Agreement for the Community Development Block Grant program.
City Council will consider a resolution to deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission’s approval of a use permit and six variances for a new two‑story single‑family home at 305 Haight St.
Staff reported on progress toward the city’s RHNA goal of 2,946 new units, including plans for affordable housing on Parking Plazas 1‑3.
Council will consider a resolution to deny an appeal and keep the Planning Commission’s approval for a new two‑story single‑family home at 305 Haight St.
Mayor Nash presented a report on the upcoming RHNA Cycle 7 housing allocations.
City Council will receive an update on the regional housing needs allocation capacity and progress, and a tentative schedule for development on Parking Plazas 1, 2, and 3.
The Council will consider a resolution allowing the city manager to execute the second amendment to the Urban County Cooperation Agreement with San Mateo County for the Community Development Block Grant program.
The council will authorize the city manager to execute the second amendment to the agreement with San Mateo County for the Community Development Block Grant program.
The Planning Commission approved a use permit, architectural control permit, and affordable housing agreement for the project in accordance with State Density Bonus Law.
The commission examined exterior‑material standards, including stucco limits and window inset requirements.
The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve a vesting tentative map for the project.
Staff report proposes expanding the ground level and adding a second story to the existing approximately 808‑sq‑ft two‑bedroom house, resulting in an approximately 2,582‑sq‑ft single‑family residence with four bedrooms and three bathrooms.
The commission reviewed open‑space requirements, which do not apply to the eight‑unit project.
Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt a resolution stating Presidio Bay Ventures complied with the Springline Development Agreement for April 2025‑March 2026.
The Planning Commission is asked to adopt resolutions approving a use permit, architectural control permit, and BMR housing agreement for demolishing four existing units and building six new units on a substandard lot in the R-3 (Apartment) zoning district.
The commission reviewed façade‑modulation standards, including length limits and required recesses.
Exhibit A provides the property description for Parcel One (lots 5 and 6, block 4) at 335 Pierce Rd, APN 062-013-170.
A resident submitted a letter urging careful environmental and public‑health review of a proposed demolition and construction near community spaces.
The project will provide eight affordable homeownership units where payments cannot exceed 30 % of household income for at least 55 years.
The Planning Commission reviewed a project for a use permit, architectural control permit, and Below Market Rate (BMR) housing agreement.
Developer proposes to replace a four‑unit building with six residential condominiums at 624 University Drive.
The city will apply its adopted Below Market Rate (BMR) preferences to the project, consistent with Fair Housing laws.
Tim Wong, the City Housing Manager, submitted a proposal for reasonably equivalent alternatives to the BMR Guidelines.
The project proposes eight affordable homeownership units with payments no more than 30% of household income.
The commission will consider a resolution covering density‑bonus waivers and CEQA compliance for the Pierce Road project.
The city found utilities are concealed and integrated with the building design.
The Planning Commission considered a resolution concerning Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and the State Subdivision Map Act.
The applicant proposes to add a second story and expand the ground level of an existing 808‑sq‑ft two‑bedroom house, creating a 2,582‑sq‑ft single‑family residence.
The city determined the project is consistent with horizontal, vertical, and rooftop building profile standards.
All below-market-rate apartments are occupied and one person remains on the waitlist.
The city plans to redevelop two vacant parcels as Housing Element Opportunity Site #60 to meet its Regional Housing Needs Allocation.
Attachment B, Exhibit G for 624 University Drive is presented.
Project will redevelop two vacant parcels into eight BMR homeownership units.
Project proposes four market‑rate detached units and two affordable units in a duplex.
Community-level environmental review has been certified for the City’s General Plan, including the Housing Element.
Proposal adds two one‑bedroom units to existing four, making six units total.
The applicant asks for a BMR guideline incentive to allow smaller units and waive impact fees.
Project provides four market‑rate units and two affordable units in R‑3 zone near El Camino Real.
The item requests recording of the agreement and deed restrictions governing resale controls for a low‑income BMR home.
The agenda item outlines insurance policies and coverage limits required for the project during its affordability period.
The agenda item provides Exhibit A detailing the property description for the project.
The item includes the resale restriction agreement and insurance requirements for a very low‑income BMR home.
The project is within half a mile of a major transit stop, meeting CEQA location criteria.
The agenda item presents Exhibit C containing the resale restriction agreement for the BMR units.
The item includes Exhibit B outlining the Below‑Market‑Rate (BMR) housing proposal.
The site is a previously developed urban infill property with a four‑unit residential building.
The project satisfies CEQA requirements for public health, seismic, landslide, flood, open space, and conservancy criteria.
Presentation of streetscape design for 632 University Drive.
The project complies with R‑3 (Apartment) zoning and the General Plan land‑use designation.
The resolution cites the housing element update and mitigation monitoring and reporting program.
Presentation of floor area diagram for Units E and F.
The agenda includes detailed survey, grading, erosion, tree protection, and construction phasing plans for 624 University Drive.
The resolution calculates a maximum floor‑area ratio of 6,582.14 sf based on code compliance.
The agenda notes a request to reduce the transportation impact fee for two below‑market‑rate units at 1908 Menalto Ave.
The resolution sets affordable housing payments at no more than 30% of household income for households earning up to 80% of area median income.
Presentation of floor area diagrams for Units B and C.
The agenda includes conceptual floor plans for Units B and C.
Presentation of building sections E and F.
Presentation of floor area diagram for Unit A.
Presentation of conceptual floor plan for Units E & F.
Presentation of building sections A through D.
The agenda includes a conceptual floor plan for Unit A of the project.
The project meets all city codes except for waivers under State Density Bonus Law.
A public hearing will be held to review the detailed floor plan showing unit layouts and skylights.
A public hearing will be held to review the elevation drawings and setback measurements for the project.
A public hearing will be held to discuss the roof plan and a request for impact‑fee concessions for the proposed development.
A public hearing will be held to review the environmental exemption for the six‑unit infill project at 1908 Menalto Ave.
A public hearing will be held for the listed balcony dimensions.
Exhibit A contains project plans, description letter, housing agreement, and density‑bonus waivers.
A public hearing will be held for the listed item B.
A public hearing will be held for the listed garage dimensions.
A public hearing will be held for the front view plan.
The Planning Commission will consider a resolution for the residential infill project.
A public hearing will be held to confirm the project meets noise, air quality, and utility standards.
The Planning Commission will consider a resolution confirming CEQA compliance.
A public hearing will be held for the listed building plan.
A public hearing will be held for the listed lawn deck plan.
The project proposes replacing an existing duplex with a single‑family house and an attached accessory dwelling unit.
A public hearing will be held for the listed building plan.
A public hearing will be held for the listed item C roof and skylight details.
The commission will consider a resolution to approve a use permit for interior modifications and first and second story additions that exceed 50% of the replacement value of the existing nonconforming residence at 1024 Sevier Ave.
Planning Commission approves 12 waivers from development standards for a multifamily housing project.
The commission will consider a resolution to approve a use permit to demolish an existing single‑story duplex and construct a new two‑story single‑family residence on a substandard lot in the R‑2 zoning district.
A public hearing will review a location map for the property at 1024 Sevier Avenue.
The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing regarding the property at 1908 Menalto Ave owned by Changxu & Yaying.
Planning Commission reviewed a draft Below Market Rate (BMR) housing agreement and 12 development waivers.
The Planning Commission will consider resolutions to approve a use permit, architectural control permit, and a below‑market‑rate (BMR) housing agreement for a new six‑unit residential project at 624 University Dr.
The Commission will consider and adopt a resolution to approve a use permit that allows demolition of an existing duplex and construction of a new two‑story single‑family residence with an accessory dwelling unit on a substandard lot.
The Commission will consider and adopt a resolution to approve a use permit for interior modifications and first‑ and second‑story additions that exceed 50% of the replacement value of the existing nonconforming house. The agenda also includes a permit for a two‑story residence that exceeds the existing floor area on a substandard lot.
Commission will approve a use permit, architectural control permit, major subdivision, and below‑market‑rate housing agreement to replace four existing units with five new three‑story buildings, providing six units including two affordable units.
Commission will adopt a resolution to approve a use permit to demolish an existing duplex and build a new two‑story single‑family residence with an accessory dwelling unit on a substandard lot.
The scheduled Housing Commission meeting on July 1, 2026 at 6:30 p.m. has been cancelled.
The regular Housing Commission meeting set for July 1, 2026 at 6:30 p.m. has been cancelled. The next regular meeting is scheduled for August 5, 2026.
The meeting set for July 1, 2026 at 6:30 p.m. has been cancelled. The next regular meeting is scheduled for August 5, 2026.
City Council will consider a resolution to change land‑use rules in the Main Street Overlay, allowing certain existing buildings to add up to two‑thirds of the public‑benefit bonus floor‑area ratio for office space.
Council will consider a resolution to change land‑use allowances in the Downtown/Station Area “Main Street” Overlay, including new allowances for office space and modifications to several use categories such as animal clinics, banks, and business services.
Council will hold a public hearing and vote on amendments to the El Camino Real/Downtown Specific Plan. The changes modify land‑use rules, allowing certain office floor‑area bonuses in the “Main Street” overlay.
The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on the shower flow design requirement for the remodel.
Consider and adopt a resolution to approve a use permit for first‑floor additions and interior and exterior renovations to an existing nonconforming single‑story, single‑family residence in the R‑1‑U zoning district at 503 O’Keefe Street.
The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on the residential remodel site plan at 503 Okeefe Street.
Review thermal emittance values for the project.
Neighbor Brian Gilmer wrote to the Planning Commission supporting the remodel, stating no impact on his property line.
The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on the utilities plan for the residential remodel at 503 Okeefe Street.
The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on the dual‑flush toilet requirement (CALGREEN 4.303.1.1) for the remodel.
The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on the crawl space demolition for the residential remodel at 503 Okeefe Street.
An email from Heather Young to a personal address is listed as part of the agenda item.
The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on the floor plan demolition for the residential remodel at 503 Okeefe Street.
The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on the vent quantity calculation (16 vents required) for the remodel.
Consider and adopt a resolution to approve a use permit, architectural control permit, major subdivision, and Below Market Rate (BMR) Housing Agreement to demolish an existing office building and construct five new three‑story residential buildings with six dwelling units on a substandard lot at 624 University Dr. in the R‑3 zoning district.
The design uses a transitional style with vertical siding and dark‑grey metal‑clad windows.
Present south elevation drawings with dimensions, roof slopes, and utility locations.
Consider and adopt a resolution to approve a use permit to demolish an existing single‑story, single‑family residence and construct a new two‑story, single‑family residence on a substandard lot at 351 McKendry Drive in the R‑1‑U zoning district.
The ground‑floor plan for the remodel is presented.
The site plan shows utility locations, setbacks, and fencing for the remodel.
The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on the mechanical venting notes for the remodel.
The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on the GPM (gallons per minute) specification for the remodel.
Heather Young Architects thanks the public for reviewing the remodel proposal and invites questions.
The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on the gallons‑per‑minute specification for the remodel.
The item requires a minimum opening of 100 square inches for make-up air in the laundry room.
Present color choice of Solaris Silver Birch for exterior finishes.
The project uses a crawl‑space with wood‑frame Type V‑B construction.
The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on the roof plan for the residential remodel at 503 Okeefe Street.
The public hearing will examine non‑conforming structure areas in the remodel plan for 503 O’Keefe Street.
Architect Heather Young submitted a residential remodel/addition permit for 503 Okeefe Street.
The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on the requirement for a minimum of 100 CFM continuous ventilation verified by a HERS rater.
The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on the gallons‑per‑minute specification at 60 PSI for the remodel.
The public hearing will review building coverage calculations for the remodel at 503 O’Keefe Street.
Present west elevation drawings with dimensions, roof slopes, and utility locations.
A map showing the project location was drawn by Matthew Ball and checked by Tom Smith.
A discussion item listed the construction type and the number of stories for a project.
An outreach letter was hand‑delivered to immediate neighbors describing the remodel project.
The project includes proposed front‑facade and rear‑facade designs.
The project proposes a remodel and addition to the house at 503 O'Keefe Street.
The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on the vent size requirement (5" x 17") for the remodel.
A public hearing will discuss removal of a non‑heritage Privet Ligustrum tree on site.
A public hearing will discuss removal of a non‑heritage Cypress Callitris tree on site.
Commission staff presented an update on potential amendments to the city’s zoning and subdivision ordinances to comply with Senate Bills 9 and 450, which would affect urban lot splits and two‑unit housing in single‑family zones.
The commission will consider a resolution to approve a use permit, architectural control permit, major subdivision, and Below‑Market‑Rate (BMR) housing agreement for a project that demolishes an office building and builds five three‑story residential buildings with six units at 624 University Drive. Two units will be set aside as BMR housing for very low‑ and low‑income households.
The council will waive the second reading and adopt a revised ADU ordinance to align with state law.
City Council is asked to adopt a resolution approving a vesting tentative subdivision map that would split the property at 68 Willow Rd into 50 condominium parcels and one common‑area parcel in the C‑1 zoning district.
The council will waive the second reading and adopt a revised ordinance replacing Chapter 16.79 on Accessory Dwelling Units. The changes bring local ADU rules into compliance with recent state housing laws and add objective design standards.
The council will consider and adopt a resolution approving a tentative subdivision map that creates 50 condominium parcels and one common‑area parcel at 68 Willow Rd in the C‑1 zoning district.
The City Council will waive the second reading and adopt a new ordinance that replaces Chapter 16.79 on Accessory Dwelling Units. The new ordinance aligns city rules with state law and adds local objective standards.
City Council will waive the second reading and adopt a new ordinance that repeals and replaces Chapter 16.79 on accessory dwelling units to align with state law and local objectives. The change is listed on the consent calendar.
Council will consider and adopt a resolution to approve a vesting tentative subdivision map that splits the property at 68 Willow Rd into 50 condominium parcels and one common area parcel in the C‑1 zoning district.
The proposal seeks to increase building height and floor‑area ratio under the bonus level development allowance.
Staff proposes updating Chapters 15.31 and 16.77 to align with Senate Bills 9 and 450.
The Planning Commission discussed SB 79 and its impact on housing development.
Staff recommends the commission review potential changes to Chapters 15.31 and 16.77 to align with Senate Bills 9 and 450.
The Commission considered a draft ordinance that would exempt certain sites from SB 79 requirements.
The commission held a public hearing on amendments related to SB 79 and SB 9, discussing temporary exemptions, density, height, and FAR allowances, and recommended that the City Council let SB 79 take full effect and study its impacts.
The Commission will consider a use permit to demolish an existing single‑family house and garage and build a new two‑story home with an attached garage and an accessory dwelling unit (ADU) on a substandard lot in the R‑1‑U zoning district. The project is categorically exempt from CEQA.
What's happening
Why it matters
The new home and ADU add housing units and could increase neighborhood density, while the ADU provides affordable rental options.
Who is affected
How to act
Attend: Join the meeting in person at City Council Chambers or online via Zoom.
Email: planning.commission@menlopark.gov
Submit comment: Submit a written comment online up to 1 hour before the meeting start time, including the agenda item number.
Decision update
The item “Use permit for 763 College Ave. – new house with ADU” was outcome recorded (6–0).
Decided Jun 8, 2026.
Commission will discuss potential amendments to zoning and subdivision rules to align with Senate Bills 9 and 450, which affect lot splits and two‑unit housing.
Commission will discuss potential amendments to the city’s regulations for urban lot splits and two‑unit housing to comply with Senate Bills 9 and 450, and explore options to streamline review in single‑family zones.
What's happening
Why it matters
Updates could allow more flexible housing options, impacting affordability and development patterns.
Who is affected
How to act
Attend: Attend the study session in person or via Zoom.
Email: planning.commission@menlopark.gov
Submit comment: No specific comment deadline listed.
Decision update
The item “Study session on SB 9 zoning and subdivision amendments” was outcome recorded (7–0).
Decided Jun 8, 2026.
Commission will consider amendments to the zoning ordinance to temporarily exclude sites within one‑quarter mile of the Caltrain station from Senate Bill 79 requirements, and will recommend the changes to the City Council.
The commission will create ad‑hoc committees, adopt their purpose statements, and select members.
The Commission will create ad hoc committees.
Developer must keep the project and property in good repair, safe and sanitary condition during the agreement term.
The BMR Housing Program aims to increase affordable housing for low- and moderate-income households.
The City or its designee checks major lenders for prevailing interest rates, loan terms, points, and minimum down payments, then estimates monthly housing costs.
The presentation describes that developer obligations end when the BMR unit is recorded to the buyer or City under the grant deed and resale restriction agreement.
Agreement will be recorded in San Mateo County records and cannot be subordinated to any lien without City consent, except for taxes and permitted encumbrances.
The city no longer maintains a ranked BMR purchase waitlist and does not add new households to it.
Initial selling price for BMR for‑sale units is set based on a percentage of area median income (AMI) for various income levels.
After the seller notifies the City and the unit is approved as salable, the City sets the sale price for the BMR unit.
The City establishes the sales price using the original selling price, depreciation of improvements, and one‑third of the Bay Area cost‑of‑living index increase, choosing the lower of the appraised value or the computed price.
No details are provided for this item.
BMR owners must contact the City’s BMR Housing Program provider before refinancing or taking an equity line.
Commission will develop an anti-displacement strategy and evaluate community-identified tools.
The commission will vote to approve the meeting minutes from May 6, 2026.
The presentation explains that BMR units will be sold only to eligible low‑income or very low‑income buyers as defined by state code.
Developer must execute and record a BMR Housing Agreement before a building permit can be issued.
Developers may provide off‑site BMR units if approved, and must be ready before project completion while meeting the same income criteria as on‑site units.
Staff reported on May’s Affordable Housing Month.
The maximum sales price is calculated to be affordable for eligible BMR households using income limits, mortgage rates, down payments, and other homeownership costs.
Developer must design and build the project in compliance with all applicable laws, codes, and disability access requirements.
Recommend the Planning Commission approve a below‑market‑rate housing agreement for a 6‑unit development at 624 University Dr.
The City records the agreement at no charge and requires owner consent for any lease or rental, especially short‑term rentals.
The sale procedure follows the same steps outlined in earlier sections, substituting the seller for the developer.
Presentation of the exhibit that details the resale restriction agreement for a low‑income below‑market‑rate home.
After a public hearing, the Planning Commission approved a use permit, architectural control, affordable housing agreement, and concessions for a project under State Density Bonus Law.
The work plan includes pursuing affordable housing on city‑owned downtown parking lots.
Developers must notify the city when a BMR unit passes its final building inspection and is ready for sale.
The presentation explains that a transfer not complying with the conditions is deemed a “Prohibited Transfer.”
Presentation of the insurance requirements exhibit for a very‑low‑income below‑market‑rate home resale restriction.
All household members must not have owned a primary residence in the past three years.
The agreement becomes effective when the developer receives a certificate of occupancy or temporary certificate of occupancy from the City.
The commission will recommend the Planning Commission approve a below‑market‑rate housing agreement for a 6‑unit development at 624 University Dr.
Developer proposes two BMR units: one low-income and one very low-income.
The presentation states that purchasers must sign a statement agreeing to occupy the BMR unit as their principal residence and not rent it, except as allowed.
Staff reported on the resource fair planning progress.
The developer must build the project following the City’s Municipal Code and all applicable laws.
A cure of default made by the developer’s limited partner or senior mortgage lender counts as a cure by the developer.
Only households with gross incomes at or below the Low Income level for San Mateo County, adjusted for household size, may occupy BMR rental units.
Applicants must meet income eligibility limits to be placed on the BMR interest list.
The commission is reviewing the legacy list that gives priority to households previously on the ranked BMR purchase waitlist.
The commission is reviewing the governing law clause of the housing agreement.
When the seller notifies the City and the unit is deemed in good repair, the City sets the price for the BMR unit.
All household members must live together as their primary residence at the time of application.
The City or its designee obtains an appraisal to determine the market value of the unit.
Applicants must not have owned a home as a primary residence within the last three years.
The commission is reviewing price guidelines for on‑site BMR units and the bonus‑unit allowance.
The commission is reviewing the indemnification clause that requires the developer to defend and hold the city harmless.
Households with gross incomes at or below the Low Income level for San Mateo County can occupy Below Market Rate (BMR) rental units.
The City Council will set a rental in‑lieu fee tied to the cost of building a standard one‑bedroom unit.
BMR owners can refinance their debt but must contact the City's BMR program provider first.
The developer must comply with state labor standards, zoning, building, plumbing, mechanical, electrical codes, and the ADA.
BMR units must use design and materials comparable to other new units in the development.
The City sets the sales price based on original price, depreciation, and a portion of the Bay Area cost‑of‑living increase, using the lower of appraised value or computed price.
The City hires a realtor to manage the sale of the BMR unit.
Households must have gross income at or below 120% of the San Mateo County AMI, adjusted for household size.
City staff reported on activity, deposits, disbursements, and available funds for the BMR Housing Fund.
The presentation defines “Transfer” to include sales, assignments, or loans on BMR units.
The Housing Commission may create an ad hoc subcommittee to advise the full commission.
The developer must obtain all city and other governmental permits before construction begins.
The developer proposes two BMR units: one low‑income and one very low‑income.
BMR units must match market‑rate units in size and square footage.
The commission is reviewing rules for providing BMR units at locations other than the main development.
Performance delays caused by war, strikes, riots, flood or similar events are not considered a default.
Developer must follow recordkeeping and monitoring guidelines set by the City.
The party that wins a lawsuit can recover its costs and reasonable attorney fees from the other party.
The agreement runs with the land and binds the developer and its permitted successors and assigns.
Buyers must sign and record a Resale Restriction Agreement that limits future sales to low‑income or very low‑income households for a period of fifty‑five (55) years.
Purchasers must sign a statement agreeing to occupy the BMR unit as their principal residence.
The City and seller agree on a schedule of open houses for the unit, arranged at the seller’s convenience.
Residential projects of five or more units must submit a BMR Housing Agreement.
The developer must keep the project and property in good repair and safe condition during the agreement term.
The presentation outlines transfers that do not substantially comply with the required conditions.
Developer covenants that there will be no discrimination based on protected classes in sale, lease, or occupancy of the units.
The commission is reviewing how BMR unit requirements grow as the number of units in a development increases.
At least 50% of the ownership interest in a BMR property must belong to the qualifying applicant(s).
The City is the only party that can enforce the agreement to meet affordable‑housing goals.
Sellers must notify the City by certified mail and ensure the unit is in good repair and “salable condition,” covering items like flooring, systems, fixtures, and landscaping.
The City can waive any term or condition of the agreement by written consent.
The City checks major lenders to obtain current mortgage rates, loan terms, points, and down‑payment requirements.
BMR owners must contact the City before adding anyone to title or transferring the unit.
A notice is considered satisfied three days after it is mailed by first‑class certified mail.
The agreement becomes effective when the developer receives a certificate of occupancy or temporary certificate.
The City or its designee obtains the homeowner’s dues, insurance, and tax amounts from the seller.
No final inspection of BMR units until the purchase or rental price is agreed in writing by the developer and the City Manager.
All adult applicants and household members must complete a one-time homebuyer education workshop, class, or counseling session.
The agreement will be recorded in San Mateo County records and cannot be subordinated to other liens without City written consent.
Staff asks the Housing Commission to recommend the Planning Commission approve a BMR agreement for two low‑income, for‑sale units in a six‑unit townhouse project at 624 University Dr.
The commission is reviewing the amendment clause that only written agreements can change the housing agreement.
If any part of the agreement is declared invalid, the rest remains enforceable.
The City or its designee files the Grant Deed, BMR Agreement, Deed Restrictions, and release with the title insurance company for recording.
The procedure follows the same steps as Sections 9.1.7‑9.1.16, substituting the seller for the developer.
Developers must notify the City when a BMR unit is ready for sale and occupancy.
Requests for BMR fund use must be submitted to staff with details on the proposal, funding amount, households served, and loan terms.
Any right, power, or remedy in the agreement is cumulative and does not exclude other rights.
Owners must occupy the BMR property as their primary residence for 55 years, staying at least 10 months each year.
City members, officials, employees, and agents are not personally liable for any default or breach by the City.
A household includes all people living in a housing unit, such as family members, lodgers, foster children, or employees.
The BMR Housing Fund may provide below‑market‑rate financing for homebuyers.
The city will sell BMR units only to eligible low‑income or very low‑income buyers.
Staff recommends the Housing Commission approve a draft Below Market Rate (BMR) Housing Agreement for a six‑unit townhouse project at 624 University Dr. The agreement includes two on‑site, for‑sale, low‑income and very low‑income units.
The presentation states that the agreement will be interpreted under California law. Any references to statutes will follow future amendments, and legal actions will be taken in the County.
Developers must notify the city when a BMR unit passes its final inspection. City staff then inspect the unit, issue a certifying letter, and determine the unit’s price using tax, HOA, and other data. Household size calculations include children under joint custody arrangements.
A presentation explained how BMR (Below‑Market‑Rate) units will be sold to eligible low‑income and very low‑income buyers under the BMR Ordinance. The sale process begins once the city sets the Maximum Sales Price.
The agreement states that if either party brings a lawsuit to enforce rights, the prevailing party can recover reasonable attorney’s fees and costs from the other party.
The presentation explains that the agreement cannot be changed orally; any amendment must be a written document signed by both the developer and the city.
The commission will present that the BMR Housing Fund may provide below‑market‑rate financing for homebuyers as one of its eligible uses. No decision is required.
The City or its designee obtains an appraisal to determine the unit’s market value, considering any substantial improvements made by the seller.
The presentation states that, if authorized, developers may provide BMR units at a different site, but they must be delivered by project completion and meet the same income‑target percentages as on‑site units. Existing units must be repaired at developer expense, and pricing follows the same guidelines as on‑site units.
The agreement provides that if any provision is declared invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions stay in effect.
The commission will describe how the City or its designee will set a sales price based on the original price, depreciation, and one‑third of the Bay Area cost‑of‑living index increase. The lower of market value or computed price will be used. No vote is needed.
The presentation described how a developer's responsibilities end once a BMR unit is recorded to an eligible buyer, following the grant deed and Resale Restriction Agreement requirements.
The commission will describe the process after a seller notifies the City and the unit is deemed in good repair. It covers how the City sets the price for the BMR unit. No action is requested.
The presentation highlighted transfers that do not meet the required conditions and the resulting default consequences under the BMR agreement.
The presentation explains that the city no longer maintains a ranked BMR purchase waitlist, but created a legacy list for households that were on the ranked list as of January 1, 2021, giving them priority over new applicants until the list is empty.
The commission outlined the definition of a first‑time homebuyer. It states that no household member may have owned a primary residence in the past three years. Mobile home owners are also included.
The presentation outlines that approvals required by the agreement must be in writing, and the city manager or designee may grant approvals that cannot be unreasonably withheld.
The agreement clarifies that any right, power, or remedy provided is not exclusive and can be used together with other rights or remedies.
The presentation says the developer must repay the city for reasonable costs, including attorney fees, incurred in reviewing transfer documents and successor qualifications, within ten days of receiving an invoice.
The commission will present that the City or its designee will check major lenders for current mortgage information, including interest rates and down payments, to estimate monthly housing costs. This supports the BMR unit pricing process. No decision is required.
Developer must secure all required city and other governmental permits before construction begins.
The presentation states that, to the fullest extent allowed by law, the developer must indemnify and defend the city and its heirs, using counsel approved by the city.
The presentation requires the developer to maintain insurance as specified in Exhibit D at its own expense until the unit is transferred and the resale restriction agreement takes effect.
BMR units have a 55‑year right of first refusal for the City, with purchase price based on market value or seller price plus CPI adjustments.
The agreement states that it is a covenant that runs with the land, binding the developer’s successors and assigns to its terms.
The agreement defines a household as all persons occupying a housing unit, including family members, lodgers, foster children, wards, or employees, and sets residency requirements.
The agreement sets notice requirements, stating that notices are deemed satisfied three days after mailing or upon personal delivery, and provides the developer’s address for notices.
The developer proposes two Below Market Rate (BMR) units: one low‑income unit and one very low‑income unit. The very low‑income unit is designated to satisfy the project's BMR obligation.
BMR owners may refinance, but must first contact the city’s BMR housing program provider. The provider supplies the current BMR valuation and ensures any loan does not exceed that value. A refinancing fee is set by the provider.
The presentation stated that the design and materials used in BMR units must be comparable to other new units in the development, though not required to be luxury quality.
Applicants must have at least 50% ownership interest in the property they purchase.
The Planning Commission approved a use permit, architectural control, and an affordable housing agreement for the 624 University Dr. project. The City Council approved a Vesting Tentative Map for the same project.
The developer agrees to build the project in compliance with the Municipal Code and all applicable laws. This presentation outlines the purpose of the city’s BMR Housing Program.
The commission will review the Housing Commission’s work plan for 2026‑2027.
Council adopted a resolution authorizing the city manager to amend the agreement with Peninsula Clean Energy to continue a state‑funded home electrification program.
Council introduced and waived the first reading of an ordinance to repeal and replace Chapter 16.79 (Accessory Dwelling Units) to align with state law and add local standards.
What's happening
Why it matters
Updates ADU rules, affecting homeowners who want to add secondary units and influencing housing supply.
Who is affected
How to act
Attend: Not listed in the source document.
Email: Not listed in the source document.
Submit comment: Not listed in the source document.
Decision update
The item “Replace Accessory Dwelling Units ordinance for consistency with state law” passed unanimously (Unanimous).
Decided May 19, 2026.
Council considered and approved the City’s Anti‑displacement Plan.
The commission reviewed a request to change the use of a commercial print‑shop space to a church within a multi‑tenant building in the LS zoning district.
What's happening
Why it matters
The change introduces a new religious use, which may affect parking, traffic, and neighborhood dynamics, though no exterior changes are proposed.
Who is affected
How to act
Attend: Attend in person or via Zoom (ID# 846 9472 6242).
Email: planning.commission@menlopark.gov
Submit comment: Written comments accepted up to 1 hour before the meeting start time.
Decision update
The Planning Commission voted 5‑0 to adopt a resolution approving a use permit that would change the existing commercial print shop at 1100 O’Brien Drive to a church in the Life Sciences zoning district. This recorded action does not constitute final approval of the permit.
Decided May 18, 2026.
The commission reviewed a request to add floor area, modify windows, doors, and roof gables, and keep a fence taller than four feet for a single‑family home on a substandard lot.
What's happening
Why it matters
If approved, the homeowner can expand living space and keep the taller fence, affecting the lot’s compliance with zoning and neighborhood character.
Who is affected
How to act
Attend: Attend the meeting in person at City Council Chambers or via Zoom (ID# 846 9472 6242).
Email: planning.commission@menlopark.gov
Submit comment: Written comments accepted up to 1 hour before the meeting start time.
Decision update
The Planning Commission voted 5‑0 to adopt a resolution approving a use‑permit revision for 725 Cotton Street, adding floor area and modifications to the existing single‑family residence. This recorded action does not constitute final approval of the permit.
Decided May 18, 2026.
The commission considered a set of specific‑plan amendments that would modify allowed uses (e.g., animal clinics, banks, business services) and increase office floor‑area bonuses in the Main Street Overlay.
What's happening
Why it matters
These changes could reshape the mix of businesses and services along Santa Cruz Avenue and affect future development opportunities.
Who is affected
How to act
Attend: Attend in person or via Zoom (ID# 846 9472 6242).
Email: planning.commission@menlopark.gov
Submit comment: Written comments accepted up to 1 hour before the meeting start time.
Decision update
The item “Amend specific plan for 870 Santa Cruz Avenue” was outcome recorded (5–0).
Decided May 18, 2026.
The council introduced and waived reading of an ordinance amending the zoning map to temporarily exclude eligible sites within 0.25 mi of the Caltrain station from Senate Bill 79 requirements. The amendment would allow those sites to follow existing zoning instead of the new higher‑density rules.
What's happening
Why it matters
Affects how new housing can be built near the transit station, influencing affordability and neighborhood character.
Who is affected
How to act
Attend: Attend the City Council meeting in person or via Zoom to hear the discussion.
Email: Not listed in the source document.
Submit comment: Not listed in the source document.
Decision update
No action was taken on “Ordinance to temporarily exempt sites near Caltrain from SB 79”.
Decided May 12, 2026.
Council will adopt a proclamation recognizing Affordable Housing Month.
The city is hosting an open house for residents to meet the three development teams working on proposals for Downtown Parking Plazas 1, 2, and 3. Attendees can learn about each team's plans and ask questions. No official decisions will be made at this event.
Staff presented the draft Anti-displacement Plan and asked the Housing Commission to review it and recommend approval to the City Council. The plan includes strategies such as rental assistance, legal assistance, expanded just‑cause eviction protections, and a tenant anti‑harassment ordinance.
What's happening
Why it matters
If approved, the plan will add stronger tenant protections and support programs that can help prevent evictions and keep residents in their homes, especially in the Belle Haven neighborhood.
Who is affected
How to act
Attend: Attend the meeting in person at Belle Haven Community Campus, Event Room or join via Zoom (Meeting ID 865 4847 4804).
Email: Email the city clerk at jaherren@menlopark.gov for comments or questions.
Submit comment: Submit written comments by the public‑comment deadline (deadline not listed).
Decision update
The item “Review and recommend approval of the City of Menlo Park Anti-displacement Plan” passed (5–0–1).
Decided May 6, 2026.
Residents can speak for up to three minutes on any issue not listed on the agenda.
The commission will review a staff report and recommend the anti‑displacement plan to the City Council.
The Commission will consider a resolution to approve a use permit and six variances for a two‑story single‑family residence on a substandard lot at 305 Haight Street. The variances would reduce setbacks, lower parking requirements, increase building coverage, and raise the height of the daylight plane. The action is classified as CEQA Class 3 exempt.
The Commission will hold a study session to discuss the use permit, architectural control, tentative parcel map, heritage tree removal permits, and Below Market Rate housing agreement for the O'Brien Drive project. The session is for staff and the public to provide feedback before any final decisions.
The council will authorize a $1 million loan and related agreements with 320 Sheridan LP to fund affordable housing at 320 Sheridan Dr. The same amount is appropriated from the below‑market‑rate housing fund.
The commission held a public hearing on proposed amendments to the zoning ordinance and map to temporarily exclude certain downtown parcels within 0.25 mile of the Caltrain station from SB 79 requirements. The commission will recommend the changes to the City Council.
What's happening
Why it matters
Exempting these sites could limit the density and height of new housing near transit, affecting neighborhood character and housing supply.
Who is affected
How to act
Attend: Attend the hearing in person or via Zoom.
Email: Not listed in the source document.
Submit comment: Not listed in the source document.
Decision update
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on proposed zoning ordinance and map amendments that would temporarily exempt certain downtown sites from SB 79 and determined the ordinance would be exempt from CEQA. The commission did not adopt the amendments, leaving the final decision to the City Council.
Decided Apr 27, 2026.
Commission staff presented an update on Senate Bill 9 and related zoning and subdivision ordinance changes. The session gathered feedback on possible amendments to align city regulations with state law.
What's happening
Why it matters
Changes could affect how single‑family zones handle lot splits and two‑unit developments, impacting homeowners and new housing projects.
Who is affected
How to act
Attend: Attend the study session in person or via Zoom.
Email: Not listed in the source document.
Submit comment: Not listed in the source document.
Decision update
The City Council voted 5‑1 to direct staff to study the effects of SB 79 on the city at a future date.
Decided Apr 27, 2026.
Commission staff presented the draft anti‑displacement plan, outlining strategies to protect renters and preserve affordable housing.
What's happening
Why it matters
The plan could shape policies that help keep residents in their homes and guide future housing decisions.
Who is affected
How to act
Attend: Ver la reunión en vivo por Zoom (ID# 846 9472 6242) o en persona en la Cámara del Consejo Municipal.
Email: No indicado en el documento fuente.
Submit comment: No indicado en el documento fuente.
Decision update
The Planning Commission approved the draft Anti‑Displacement Plan after public comment, endorsing its recommendations and outlining initial implementation steps.
Decided Apr 27, 2026.
Commission staff presented potential amendments to the city’s rules for lot splits and two‑unit developments to align with SB 9 and SB 450.
Commission adopted a resolution recommending the City Council accept the 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report, which reviews housing and environmental justice progress.
Commission will consider recommending to the City Council to repeal old ADU regulations and adopt updated rules that align with state law.
Commission considered and adopted a resolution to allow demolition of an existing single‑family home and construction of a new two‑story home with an accessory dwelling unit on a substandard lot in the R‑1‑U zone.
The Commission considered and adopted a resolution to allow demolition of an existing single‑family house and construction of a new two‑story residence with an attached ADU on a substandard lot in the R‑1‑U zone. The project is CEQA Class 3 exempt.
The Commission considered a recommendation to the City Council to repeal existing ADU regulations and adopt updated rules that align with state law and local objectives.
What's happening
Why it matters
Changing ADU rules could make it easier for homeowners to add secondary units, increasing affordable housing options.
Who is affected
How to act
Attend: Zoom (ID# 846 9472 6242) or in‑person at City Council Chambers, 751 Laurel St.
Email: planning.commission@menlopark.gov
Submit comment: Send written comments to planning.commission@menlopark.gov up to 1 hour before the meeting, referencing the agenda item number.
Decision update
The Planning Commission approved a recommendation to the City Council to amend Chapter 16.79 of the Menlo Park Municipal Code, repealing the existing accessory dwelling unit regulations and adopting updated regulations that align with state law and incorporate local standards.
Decided Apr 13, 2026.
The Housing Commission will consider and recommend to the Planning Commission approval of a Below Market Rate (BMR) housing agreement with 68 Willow Owners, LLC for a 50‑unit townhouse project at 68 Willow Rd, including eight on‑site low‑income rental units.
The council will adopt a resolution accepting the 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report, which includes the Housing Element and Environmental Justice Element.
What's happening
Why it matters
Shows the city is tracking progress on housing and environmental equity, informing future planning.
Who is affected
How to act
Attend: Attend the meeting or watch via Zoom.
Email: Not listed in the source document.
Submit comment: Not listed in the source document.
Decision update
The item “Adopt 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report” passed unanimously (Unanimous).
Decided Mar 24, 2026.
The council will adopt a resolution allowing the city manager to complete the purchase of 975 Florence Ln., Unit 8 and allocate up to $408,949 from the below‑market‑rate housing fund.
What's happening
Why it matters
Adds an affordable housing unit for low‑ and moderate‑income households, supporting the city’s housing goals.
Who is affected
How to act
Attend: Attend the meeting or watch via Zoom.
Email: Not listed in the source document.
Submit comment: Not listed in the source document.
Decision update
The item “Purchase of 975 Florence Ln., Unit 8 – up to $408,949” passed unanimously (Unanimous).
Decided Mar 24, 2026.
The Commission will consider a resolution recommending the City Council accept the 2025 General Plan Annual Progress Report, which updates progress on the Housing Element and Environmental Justice Element.
The Housing Commission will review the city's 2025 Housing Element Annual Progress Report and recommend that the City Council accept it. The staff report (26-001-HC) provides details on housing production, program achievements, and compliance with state requirements.
What's happening
Why it matters
The APR records the city's progress toward meeting state housing goals and informs future housing policies, funding decisions, and development approvals.
Who is affected
How to act
Attend: Attend the Housing Commission meeting on March 4, 2026 (in‑person at Arrillaga Recreation Center or via Zoom) to hear the discussion.
Email: Email the City Clerk at jaherren@menlopark.gov for more information.
Submit comment: Public comment is limited to items not on the agenda; this item cannot be commented on directly.
Decision update
The item “Review 2025 Housing Element Annual Progress Report” was approved with amendments (6–0–1).
Decided Mar 4, 2026.
Commission members and the public reviewed a draft amendment to the city’s Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) ordinance to bring it into compliance with recent state law and to consider local objective standards for non‑state‑mandated ADUs.
What's happening
Why it matters
Updating the ADU ordinance can affect how easily homeowners can add ADUs, influencing housing affordability and neighborhood development patterns.
Who is affected
How to act
Attend: Zoom meeting ID 846 9472 6242 or in‑person at City Council Chambers, 751 Laurel St.
Email: planning.commission@menlopark.gov
Submit comment: Send written comments to planning.commission@menlopark.gov, referencing agenda item number, up to 1 hour before the meeting start time.
Decision update
The item “Study session on ADU ordinance updates” was referred.
Decided Feb 23, 2026.
Staff will update the council on responses to the request for proposals to develop Parking Plazas 1, 2, and 3, including plans for affordable housing and continued public parking.
The scheduled Housing Commission meeting on Feb. 4, 2026 at 6:30 p.m. was cancelled. The next regular meeting will be on March 4, 2026.
The City Council will receive the annual report summarizing fees collected for transportation, storm drainage, construction, water capacity, recreation, and housing in‑lie fees as of June 30, 2025. The report shows revenue amounts and how fees are used for public improvements.
What's happening
Why it matters
Shows how fee revenues fund infrastructure and affordable housing, affecting taxpayers and developers.
Who is affected
How to act
Attend: Attend the meeting to hear the report.
Email: Not listed in the source document.
Submit comment: Not listed in the source document.
Decision update
The City Council voted 4‑0‑1 to approve the consent calendar that includes the annual report on development impact and in‑lie fees collected through June 30 2025, finalizing its adoption.
Decided Jan 13, 2026.
The Commission will consider a permit to modify the exterior of an existing multi‑family building, including new siding, trims, and repainting.
Commission members will discuss creating additional ad hoc subcommittees beyond the existing community‑engagement group.
What's happening
Why it matters
New subcommittees could help the commission address specific housing issues such as development, anti‑displacement, or resource coordination.
Who is affected
How to act
Attend: Participate in the meeting in person or via Zoom to hear the discussion.
Email: Not listed in the source document.
Submit comment: Not listed in the source document.
Decision update
The item “Discuss future Housing Commission ad hoc committees” was approved (6–0–1).
Decided Jan 7, 2026.
Residents can speak for up to three minutes on any subject not on the agenda.
Staff presented the BMR tenant recertification report to the commission.
Commission approved the schedule for its 2026 meetings, including potential changes to July and May dates.
The community‑engagement subcommittee reported on plans for the upcoming housing and community resource fair.
Commission voted to participate in the 2026 fair and directed the ad hoc subcommittee to prepare pre‑engagement ideas.
