Summary cards
Commission will approve a use permit, architectural control permit, major subdivision, and below‑market‑rate housing agreement to replace four existing units with five new three‑story buildings, providing six units including two affordable units.
Commission will adopt a resolution to approve a use permit to demolish an existing duplex and build a new two‑story single‑family residence with an accessory dwelling unit on a substandard lot.
The Commission will open a public comment period where anyone can address the commission for up to three minutes. Written comments can be submitted online.
Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt a resolution confirming Presidio Bay Ventures complied with the Springline Development Agreement.
Commission will vote to adopt the minutes from the June 22, 2026 meeting.
The Commission will consider and adopt a resolution to approve a use permit that allows demolition of an existing duplex and construction of a new two‑story single‑family residence with an accessory dwelling unit on a substandard lot.
The Commission will consider and adopt a resolution to approve a use permit for interior modifications and first‑ and second‑story additions that exceed 50% of the replacement value of the existing nonconforming house. The agenda also includes a permit for a two‑story residence that exceeds the existing floor area on a substandard lot.
Site plan, floor area, building coverage, elevations, and roof plans are included in the agenda.
Window and door schedules, elevations, sections, survey, and landscape design documents are included.
The staff report presents a tree inventory and protection recommendations for the 624 University Dr site.
The Planning Commission will hold a public hearing regarding the property at 1908 Menalto Ave owned by Changxu & Yaying.
The map shows tree protection zone dimensions, setbacks, and height limits for the project.
The deck project has a site coverage of 18.3% (or 19.8%).
Planning Commission approves 12 waivers from development standards for a multifamily housing project.
Sign warns that only authorized personnel may enter the tree protection area.
A public hearing will review a location map for the property at 1024 Sevier Avenue.
The Planning Commission will consider resolutions to approve a use permit, architectural control permit, and a below‑market‑rate (BMR) housing agreement for a new six‑unit residential project at 624 University Dr.
Planning Commission reviewed a draft Below Market Rate (BMR) housing agreement and 12 development waivers.
A cover sheet titled “Architectural” is included in the agenda.
General notes and conditions for the public hearing are provided.
A perspective rendering facing Menalto Ave is shown in the agenda.
The commission will consider a resolution to approve a use permit for interior modifications and first and second story additions that exceed 50% of the replacement value of the existing nonconforming residence at 1024 Sevier Ave.
The commission will consider a resolution to approve a use permit to demolish an existing single‑story duplex and construct a new two‑story single‑family residence on a substandard lot in the R‑2 zoning district.
The agenda provides dates for upcoming regular meetings, including July 13 2026 and July 27 2026.
The commission adopted a resolution referencing the City’s General Plan environmental impact reports and mitigation monitoring programs for housing projects.
Principal Planner Sandmeier reported that the City Council will consider Specific Plan updates.
The resolution confirms the project site is not subject to wildland fire hazard, explosion, or public health risks, and complies with CEQA guidelines.
A public hearing will be held for the listed garage dimensions.
A public hearing will be held for the front view plan.
The Planning Commission will consider a resolution confirming CEQA compliance.
A public hearing will be held for the listed lawn deck plan.
A public hearing will be held for the listed item B.
A public hearing will be held for the listed item C roof and skylight details.
The Planning Commission will consider a resolution for the residential infill project.
A public hearing will be held to review the environmental exemption for the six‑unit infill project at 1908 Menalto Ave.
A public hearing will be held to discuss the roof plan and a request for impact‑fee concessions for the proposed development.
A public hearing will be held to review the detailed floor plan showing unit layouts and skylights.
A public hearing will be held to confirm the project meets noise, air quality, and utility standards.
A public hearing will be held to review the elevation drawings and setback measurements for the project.
A public hearing will be held to discuss the traffic control and parking plan for the project at 624 University Dr.
The project proposes replacing an existing duplex with a single‑family house and an attached accessory dwelling unit.
Revised area plan for 1908 Menalto Ave is presented.
Exhibit A contains project plans, description letter, housing agreement, and density‑bonus waivers.
A tree inventory is being presented.
A public hearing will be held for the listed building plan.
A public hearing will be held for the listed building plan.
A public hearing will be held for the listed balcony dimensions.
The agenda notes a request to reduce the transportation impact fee for two below‑market‑rate units at 1908 Menalto Ave.
An arborist prepared a report for the property at 1908 Menalto Ave.
A warning sign designates a tree protection area where only authorized personnel may enter.
The agenda notes that all reports, plans, and data prepared by the consultant remain the consultant’s property.
A grading plan for the site at 335 Pierce Road is presented.
The project meets all city codes except for waivers under State Density Bonus Law.
The resolution sets affordable housing payments at no more than 30% of household income for households earning up to 80% of area median income.
The project complies with R‑3 (Apartment) zoning and the General Plan land‑use designation.
The resolution cites the housing element update and mitigation monitoring and reporting program.
The agenda includes detailed survey, grading, erosion, tree protection, and construction phasing plans for 624 University Drive.
The resolution addresses driveway easement and related mechanical equipment for multiple units on University Drive.
The resolution calculates a maximum floor‑area ratio of 6,582.14 sf based on code compliance.
The agenda includes a conceptual floor plan for Unit A of the project.
The agenda includes conceptual floor plans for Units B and C.
Presentation of conceptual floor plan for Units E & F.
Presentation of floor area diagram for Unit A.
Presentation of floor area diagrams for Units B and C.
Presentation of floor area diagram for Units E and F.
Presentation of building sections A through D.
Presentation of building sections E and F.
Project provides four market‑rate units and two affordable units in R‑3 zone near El Camino Real.
Project will redevelop two vacant parcels into eight BMR homeownership units.
The project meets threshold criteria under Section 15192.
Community-level environmental review has been certified for the City’s General Plan, including the Housing Element.
The site is a previously developed urban infill property with a four‑unit residential building.
The project satisfies CEQA requirements for public health, seismic, landslide, flood, open space, and conservancy criteria.
The project is within half a mile of a major transit stop, meeting CEQA location criteria.
The item requests recording of the agreement and deed restrictions governing resale controls for a low‑income BMR home.
The agenda item outlines insurance policies and coverage limits required for the project during its affordability period.
A notary public certified the identity of the signer on a document.
Attachment B, Exhibit G for 624 University Drive is presented.
Proposal adds two one‑bedroom units to existing four, making six units total.
The agenda item presents Exhibit C containing the resale restriction agreement for the BMR units.
Project proposes four market‑rate detached units and two affordable units in a duplex.
Presentation of streetscape design for 632 University Drive.
The agenda item presents the Hunter ICZ-101 Drip Control Zone Kit specifications, including a 1" ICV Globe Valve and HY100 filter system.
The applicant asks for a BMR guideline incentive to allow smaller units and waive impact fees.
The item includes the resale restriction agreement and insurance requirements for a very low‑income BMR home.
The agenda item provides Exhibit A detailing the property description for the project.
The item includes Exhibit B outlining the Below‑Market‑Rate (BMR) housing proposal.
The Planning Commission considered a resolution concerning Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and the State Subdivision Map Act.
Developer proposes to replace a four‑unit building with six residential condominiums at 624 University Drive.
The applicant proposes to add a second story and expand the ground level of an existing 808‑sq‑ft two‑bedroom house, creating a 2,582‑sq‑ft single‑family residence.
A resident submitted a letter urging careful environmental and public‑health review of a proposed demolition and construction near community spaces.
The city determined the project is consistent with horizontal, vertical, and rooftop building profile standards.
The city found utilities are concealed and integrated with the building design.
The city plans to redevelop two vacant parcels as Housing Element Opportunity Site #60 to meet its Regional Housing Needs Allocation.
The project will provide eight affordable homeownership units where payments cannot exceed 30 % of household income for at least 55 years.
The city will apply its adopted Below Market Rate (BMR) preferences to the project, consistent with Fair Housing laws.
The Planning Commission reviewed a project for a use permit, architectural control permit, and Below Market Rate (BMR) housing agreement.
All below-market-rate apartments are occupied and one person remains on the waitlist.
The project proposes eight affordable homeownership units with payments no more than 30% of household income.
Describes a 20‑foot alley portion recorded as abandoned and adjacent to the property.
Provides Exhibit B identified as 4884‑4301‑1531.
Owner must obtain and maintain the listed insurance policies throughout the affordability period.
Specifies property insurance covering all risks, including earthquake and flood, for 100% of the replacement value.
Provides Exhibit B identified as 4884‑4301‑1531 v10.
Exhibit A provides the property description for Parcel One (lots 5 and 6, block 4) at 335 Pierce Rd, APN 062-013-170.
Tim Wong, the City Housing Manager, submitted a proposal for reasonably equivalent alternatives to the BMR Guidelines.
The commission will consider a resolution covering density‑bonus waivers and CEQA compliance for the Pierce Road project.
The Planning Commission is asked to adopt resolutions approving a use permit, architectural control permit, and BMR housing agreement for demolishing four existing units and building six new units on a substandard lot in the R-3 (Apartment) zoning district.
The Planning Commission approved a use permit, architectural control permit, and affordable housing agreement for the project in accordance with State Density Bonus Law.
The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve a vesting tentative map for the project.
The arborist must include a detailed work plan and mitigation treatments in their report.
The project arborist will inspect the site during soil excavation to document actions affecting protected trees.
Staff report proposes expanding the ground level and adding a second story to the existing approximately 808‑sq‑ft two‑bedroom house, resulting in an approximately 2,582‑sq‑ft single‑family residence with four bedrooms and three bathrooms.
Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt a resolution stating Presidio Bay Ventures complied with the Springline Development Agreement for April 2025‑March 2026.
The commission examined exterior‑lighting standards to limit glare and light pollution.
The commission reviewed open‑space requirements, which do not apply to the eight‑unit project.
The commission examined exterior‑material standards, including stucco limits and window inset requirements.
The commission reviewed façade‑modulation standards, including length limits and required recesses.
The agenda includes a location map for the Pierce Road project.
